Calval
Overview
Systematic calval
Part of the validation and performance assessment process is a systematic, statistical, monitoring of the altimetric data. This is done either for each and every cycle, satellite per satellite, of by intercomparing different satellites. Annual reports enable a more synthetic view on the error budget and the possible improvements.
- Cycle per cycle, for Jason-2, Jason-1, Envisat and Topex/Poseidon
- Cycle per cycle for Envisat cross-calibration reports
- 2012 Annual reports
- Jason-2 2012 annual validation report (March 2013, (pdf, 18 Mb)
- Reprocessing of Jason-2 GDRs in version D (March 2013, pdf, 11 Mb)
- Jason-1 2012 annual validation report (March 2013, pdf, 15 Mb)
- Envisat 2012 annual validation report (March 2013, pdf, 17 Mb)
- 2012 annual validation report of comparison of altimetric data with tide gauge measurements (March 2013, pdf, 7 Mb)
- 2012 annual validation report of comparison of altimetric data with in-situ T/S ARGO profiles (March 2013, pdf, 5 Mb)
- Previous annual reports
- Jason-2 2011 annual validation report (June 2012) (pdf 16 Mb)
- Jason-1 2011 annual validation report (June 2012) (pdf, 22 Mb)
- Envisat 2011 annual validation report (June 2012) (pdf, 13 Mb)
- 2011 Validation report of the Envisat reprocessing (June 2012) (pdf, 13 pdf
- 2011 annual validation report of altimetric data by comparison with tide gauge measurements (June 2012, pdf, 7.5 Mb)
- 2011 annual validation report of altimetric data by comparison with in-situ T/S ARGO profiles (June 2012, pdf 8 Mb)
- 2010 annual validation report of absolute CalVal (April 2011, 1.9 Mb)
- 2010 Envisat annual validation report (July 2011) (pdf, 21 Mb)
- Topex/Poseidon 2005 annual validation report (January 2006) (pdf, 26.1 Mb)
- ERS-2 2005 annual validation report (January 2006) (pdf, 5.8 Mb) <//li>